tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post150016353881175690..comments2024-03-13T04:04:32.568-07:00Comments on Sku's Recent Eats: New Whiskey Labels: Wild Turkey 17 and Tullamore Dew 15skuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00487419662314518931noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-76588796733351224612015-05-29T11:13:24.236-07:002015-05-29T11:13:24.236-07:00You were right on with the $150 guess. Thought he ...You were right on with the $150 guess. Thought he interesting thing about it is that the 86.8 proof is cask strength for this one according to Eddie. The barrels were stored in brick warehouses at Stone Castle which are cooler than the metal sided wooden WT ones so less water evaporated. Joshhttp://thewhiskeyjug.com/bourbon-whiskey/wild-turkey-masters-keep-review/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-30455209371530176642015-02-20T20:35:19.630-08:002015-02-20T20:35:19.630-08:00Sam, looking at their other labels, they all seem ...Sam, looking at their other labels, they all seem to say "bottled by." Under the regs, "bottled by" can be used by both distillers and bottlers, but it still makes you wonder why they wouldn't use "distilled by." skuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00487419662314518931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-27604896157576297962015-02-20T20:14:49.345-08:002015-02-20T20:14:49.345-08:00Notice that the back label only says "bottled...Notice that the back label only says "bottled by," not "distilled and bottled by."<br /><br />Hmmmm.Sam Komlenicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-6577454057661370812015-02-20T12:44:32.234-08:002015-02-20T12:44:32.234-08:00and, if the filing label art is valid, at a lousy ...and, if the filing label art is valid, at a lousy 87 proof, no thanks. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06137567745674385407noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-60682082062883371592015-02-20T08:43:44.861-08:002015-02-20T08:43:44.861-08:00Based on their pricing generally, I would think $1...Based on their pricing generally, I would think $150 would be the minimum.skuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00487419662314518931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9082156144028140004.post-30723670639008617682015-02-20T08:41:25.472-08:002015-02-20T08:41:25.472-08:00Any guesses on how much a 17 year old WT might go ...Any guesses on how much a 17 year old WT might go for? 150? - danAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com